Midwife facing prosecution for assisting birth

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/03/us/03midwife.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070...

Prosecution of Midwife Casts Light on Home Births
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: April 3, 2006

BLOOMINGTON, Ind., March 29 — Angela Hendrix-Petry gave birth to her daughter Chloe by candlelight in her bedroom here in the early morning of March 12, with a thunderstorm raging outside and her family and midwife huddled around her.
"It was the most cozy, lovely, lush experience," Ms. Hendrix-Petry said.
According to Indiana law, though, the midwife who assisted Ms. Hendrix-Petry, Mary Helen Ayres, committed a felony punishable by up to eight years in prison. Ms. Ayres was, according to the state, practicing medicine and midwifery without a license.
Doctors, legislators and prosecutors in Indiana and in the nine other states with laws prohibiting midwifery by people other than doctors and nurses say home births supervised by midwives present grave and unacceptable medical risks. Nurse-midwives in Indiana are permitted to deliver babies at home, but most work in hospitals.
Midwives see it differently. They say the ability of women to choose to give birth at home is under assault from a medical establishment dominated by men who, for reasons of money and status, resent a centuries-old tradition that long ago anticipated the concerns of modern feminism.
Chloe Hendrix-Petry's birth has not given rise to criminal charges, but a prosecution against another midwife, Jennifer Williams, is pending in Shelbyville, Ind. It was prompted by the death of a baby named Oliver Meredith that Ms. Williams delivered in June. But she is not charged with causing or contributing to Oliver's death.
Instead, to hear the county prosecutor tell it, the case against Ms. Williams is not unlike one against a trucker caught driving without a license.
"He may be doing an awfully fine job of driving his truck," the prosecutor, R. Kent Apsley, a trim, intense and direct man, said in his office in the basement of the Shelby County courthouse. "But the state requires him to go through training, have his license and be subject to review."
Legal experts said prosecutions of midwives were rare but not unheard of, and Mr. Apsley suggested that he might have looked the other way but for Oliver's death. "There isn't anyone I'm aware of going out and doing surveillance of midwives," he said.
Stacey A. Tovino, who teaches at the Health Law and Policy Institute at the University of Houston Law Center and has written on midwifery and the law, said prosecutions of midwives almost always started with a tragedy.
"No one complains until a baby dies or a mom dies," Professor Tovino said. But once the issue arises, she said, legislatures often become involved as well, with doctors and midwives engaging in a bitter struggle over the proper regulation of midwives, one driven by a mix of motives that are difficult to disentangle.
"There has always been a tension between true quality-of-care concerns and anticompetitive concerns," Professor Tovino said.
Around the nation, there are some 3,000 midwives without formal medical training, according to the Midwives Alliance of North America. About 1,100 of them, including Ms. Williams, have been certified by the North American Registry of Midwives, a private agency whose evaluations are recognized in some 20 states. In Indiana, though, only doctors and nurses may deliver babies.
That is a misguided approach, said Ms. Ayres, who helped deliver Chloe Hendrix-Petry and who is the president of the Indiana Midwives Association.
"Midwifery is an autonomous profession," Ms. Ayres said. "It's an art and a science that predates the medical model of care. Midwifery sees birth as normal and basically safe.
"It's made safer by reliance on the woman's power," she continued. "The medical model assumes the woman is passive and her body needs to be acted upon. Every birth is presented as a potential disaster from which every woman needs to be protected and potentially rescued."
Mr. Apsley said his decision to prosecute Ms. Williams was driven solely by the law as it currently stood. "We can all have different opinions about the speed limit or the age of consent or whether drugs should be legalized," he said. "Those decisions are for the legislature."
He added that the evidence against Ms. Williams was strong.
According to an affidavit filed by Rick Isgrigg, an investigator with the Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Ms. Williams conducted a dozen prenatal examinations on Oliver's mother, Kristi Jo Meredith; monitored the fetal heart rate during labor; made a surgical incision known as an episiotomy when she detected fetal distress; performed frantic CPR on the baby when he emerged; and sutured the incision afterward. Ms. Williams charged the Merediths $1,550.
Sipping bottled water at a cafe in Bloomington, Ms. Williams, 54, was as soft-spoken and halting as Mr. Apsley was forceful and precise. She would not talk about the details of her case, citing her lawyer's advice. Her trial is scheduled for July.
She did say that she missed her practice terribly.
"You get to be there when her baby is born," Ms. Williams said. "It never loses its magic or miraculous quality."
Oliver Meredith's parents have showed little enthusiasm for the prosecution, people on both sides of the case said. "It's not like they're knocking down our doors to pursue the matter," Mr. Apsley acknowledged. "They just want to get on with their lives." Efforts to reach the Merediths by telephone and e-mail were unsuccessful.
Some 99 percent of all births take place in hospitals, and nurse-midwives participate in about 8 percent of them, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Two-thirds of the remaining births are in homes, and the last third in freestanding birthing centers. Reliable data for how many births outside of hospitals were attended by midwives with and without formal medical training were not available.
Women choosing to give birth at home are taking a big risk, said Dr. Kevin R. Burke, president of the Indiana State Medical Association.
"Because routine things sometimes become very un-routine, the best environment for labor and delivery is in a hospital or in a facility that adjoins the hospital," Dr. Burke said. If some women say that medical settings can be sterile and demeaning, he added, "well, then, let's make the hospital a more friendly, user-comfortable environment."
Ms. Williams scoffed at that.
"They hide the IV pole behind a fern," she said. "There are women who don't want a nice hospital. They want to have their baby at home."
Peggy Welch, a Democratic state representative in Bloomington, has introduced legislation in Indiana to recognize and regulate lay midwives. She said the issue boiled down to choice and safety.
"It is not illegal to have a home birth," Ms. Welch said, noting that about 1,000 Indiana families had their children at home each year. "But doctors and nurses are choosing not to do home births."
The current law, Ms. Welch said, drives midwives underground. "I don't want to have a midwife hesitate to take a woman to the hospital because she is afraid she will be arrested," she said.
Ms. Hendrix-Petry gave birth to three children before Chloe. Her oldest son was born in a hospital, where she said she received "adequate care." But, she added, "I felt like I wasn't getting the answers I needed from my high-tech doctors."
Her experience with Ms. Ayres was different, Ms. Hendrix-Petry said. "The care I have received from her felt so genuine," Ms. Hendrix-Petry said. "It was healing and miraculous."
Professor Tovino, who has studied the question for years, said she remained on the fence.
"Midwives have a terrific service to provide, and our hospitals can be overmedicalized," Professor Tovino said. "But I hope people are making informed decisions."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Tennessee midwives struggled

Tennessee midwives struggled and struggled with this issue for years. They'd been allowed to do homebirths but felt they were always walking a razor's edge, always waiting for that one stillborn baby for it all to blow up and midwifery to become illegal. The midwife's alliance (can't remember the name, right off) finally decided to self-regulate and created standards for all practicing midwives. I don't think it's law but it is followed, I think, by most midwives-although I do think there may be a few 'imperical' midwives in our state. Actually, I just checked the state govt website and it does appear to be law that the midwives worked with legislators to create: There is a governing board overseeing and licensing midwives.

sigh

I could preach for an hour here. NARM certification is an ardurous process. Midwives deliver 75% of babies in the world. The lowest rate of maternal and infant death is in Holland, where 80% 0f births are done by midwives, mostly at home.

Sunflower the unflower

__________________

Sunflower the unflower

Mom's Tinfoil Hat
Foodie loves Picky

this issue does boild down

this issue does boild down to choice and safety. I find it frusterating that the state of Indiana doesn't think that women are able to make there own educated choices about where to give birth. But that does seem to be a trend these days, the state making decisions for women about all aspects of reproductive health.

*petty thief extraordinaire*

__________________

* I'm all fight and no flight *

I agree

on the choice and safety thing. But I suppose I was sort of skeptical as I read this. Potentially it could attempt to shut down the midwifery industry in the United States, which I think would be horrible. On the one hand, I was rather surprised by the numbers presented--that only about a third of the practicing midwives were reported to have been certified by the NARM. But what exactly does that mean? I don't think it necessarily means that they haven't been trained. What does it cost to be certified? Are there other organizations that "certify" midwives? Maybe Sunflower could answer that question.

Then, it also seems--as one of the midwives quoted in the article pointed out--that this could potentially be another patriarchal attempt to diminish women's reproductive choices. Midwifery is, as they pointed out, an ancient practice. I don't necessarily think that every practicing midwife needs to be a trained doctor or nurse. Birth is a very particular practice. Apprenticeship and particular widwife training would be sufficient in my eyes.

I do think, though, that if I ever have another child an attempt to have a homebirth, I would want to make sure that my midwife had excellent credentials. We should all hope for that. But I'm wondering, if this whole thing were to create some sort of extensive regulation of midwifery, what would be the negatives of that?

Sorry this is such a clusterfuck of thoughts here. Daylight savings + a toddler who woke several times in the night = a mama who is not quite with it this morning.

doctors vs. midwives

the first time doctors put midwives out of business they burned them at the stake as witches. This has been going on a long long time.

In Ontario, midwives are regulated by the gov't and there are some negatives to that, but the biggest positive is that our provincial health insurance covers homebirths, so they are free. Until recently midwives weren't regulated or allowed to practice and there were lots of lay midwives so if you wanted a midwfe you could get one. Now that the practice is government regulated there is a midwife shortage. I am getting ready to have a homebirth and my midwife was trained in Scotland where most births are attended by midwives, you can't even get an OB unless you have a high risk pregnancy, so I feel really comfortable with her credentials AND with her experience.

All the talk about homebirth being unsafe is ridiculous and false. Countries where homebirth is the norm have better infant and maternal mortality rates than the US (23rd in the world) where most births are hospital births.

*petty thief extraordinaire*

__________________

* I'm all fight and no flight *

I totally agree that talk of

I totally agree that talk of homebirths being unsafe is ridiculous. One of the questions that I meant to articulate earlier today was what kind of influence money and insurance companies and things such as that have on this issue. It seems to me that, these days, anything that isn't regulated by something is under fire. But we've all seen and heard what a bunch of bullshit the FDA is, if we want to talk about organizations that are supposed to regulate things for people's health...right...they give the greenlight to known cancer-causing agents in our food every day. It almost seems to me that the government has done its job using scare tactics, because people are almost afraid of anything that might just be biologically natural. Ew, you're still breastfeeding your two-year-old? Why didn't you just use chemically created formula like everyone else? Ew, you drink RAW milk? That comes straight from cows? And they aren't even treated with hormones? Seriously! And here's this...wow, you actually want to give birth at home? With a midwife? You mean you won't even have an IV? No one will be able to stick you in the back with needles that could potentially cause you to be paralyzed for the rest of your life? And you're okay with that? Um, that shouldn't be allowed!

Seriously. We are so alienated from our natural selves it's strange. I'm certainly not an exception. But when I really think about it it's bizarre to me.

Yeah there is this weird

Yeah there is this weird idea of safety being promoted constantly that just doesn't match up with my idea of safety. Personally, I'd rather 'risk' homebirth than eat processed cheese, but that is just me. I am also comfortable with being exposed to bacteria of all sorts than I am having my food bleached for 'my safety' or using anti-bacterial products on absolutely everything.

time to get out my tinfoil hat!

*petty thief extraordinaire*

__________________

* I'm all fight and no flight *

I amy have an extra one *wink*

Sunflower the unflower

__________________

Sunflower the unflower

Mom's Tinfoil Hat
Foodie loves Picky

good I need it. then we can

good I need it. then we can meet for tea and I'll tell you about the infrared cameras the gov't has trained on me at all times.

*petty thief extraordinaire*

__________________

* I'm all fight and no flight *

the NARM is VERY expensive

And, I think the majority of midwives are CNMs, which is a degree and license which does not require taking the NARM.

Sunflower the unflower

__________________

Sunflower the unflower

Mom's Tinfoil Hat
Foodie loves Picky

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.